Skip to main content

WR 308 (Neary) - Fall 2018

Advanced Research Writing

System & Source Evaluation

One way of thinking of search systems is to compare them to refrigerators. They both hold content. I'll admit that refrigerators have tastier content for eating, but search systems can have some pretty "tasty" content for research and writing!

Take a look at the refrigerators below. (You can click on them to see bigger versions of the images.)

picture of a refrigerator with variety of items (1 of 4)picture of a refrigerator with a variety of items (2 of 4)picture of a refrigerator with a variety of items (3 of 4)picture of a refrigerator with a variety of items (4 of 4)

Just as refrigerators are similar but with different options and types of content, search systems are similar but with different options and types of content. By types of content, I mean that you'll probably find a different selection of food in your parents' refrigerator compared to a mini-fridge in a dorm room!

Think back to the different styles of refrigerators. There's both different content and different options. Do you want an ice maker? Do you prefer a top freezer or a side freezer? Search systems are the same way. Search engines only find the surface-level content: the free stuff. Databases find the deep content: the subscription stuff that costs money. Also, some databases search differently than others. They're all similar (subject, title, etc.), but just as those fridges have different freezer layouts, databases may have different search interface layouts. Keep that in mind with your searching and how you decide to explore your options.

Also, what about the food in those fridges? Some of it may be very tasty but not that good for you. The same thing happens with sources. Those popular sources may be fun to read, but they might not be good for your research.

A QUICK COMPARISON

Refrigerators = Search Systems

  • All of the refrigerators are similar, but they each hold different content.
  • Search systems work the same way. Similar, but different content.

Food = Sources

  • Just as you're selective in choosing your food for your meal, so should you be selective in choosing your sources for your research.
  • Don't gobble up all of the desert—"fun" sources, many of which may be popular sources.
  • Remember your fruits and veggies—detailed, scholarly sources.
  • Be sure to include protein and fiber—strong, peer-reviewed sources.
  • You want to have a well-rounded selection of sources that combine well with each other, just as separate foods combine well to create a meal.

Source Evaluation

Source evaluation is a deeper examination of your sources -- determining a source's type, characteristics, etc. From these evaluations, you'll then decide if a source is a good fit for your research.

Source Types

Source types are more than just book, journal, webpage, etc. You'll also want to determine if the source is a popular or a scholarly source.

  • Popular sources are everyday sources. They're written and produced to be read by anyone and everyone.
  • Scholarly sources are more selective. They're written and produced to be read by scholars, researchers, students, etc.

Here's a table that illustrates the differences between the two types of sources.

  Popular Scholarly
Purpose current events, entertainment, summary research, communicating information
Audience general scholars, researchers, students
Authors journalists, often unnamed researchers, experts, always named
Characteristics shorter length, informal, few citations longer length, formal, more citations, peer-reviewed*

Peer-reviewed articles have been reviewed and accepted for publication by a selected panel of recognized experts in the field of study covered by the journal (also know as the author's peers).

Source Characteristics

Source characteristics help you determine if the information from the source is reliable.

  • Authority: What is the author's background about the topic? What are the author's credentials? Is he or she an expert?
  • Currency: Is the information current? Or is it older? Does this affect the research?
  • Objectivity: Is the author objective about the topic? Or does the information provide a more subjective point of view? How does this affect the research?
  • Coverage: Does the information cover all aspects of the topic? Or only a finite portion?
  • Accuracy: Is the information accurate? Is it verifiable from other sources?
  • Relevance: Is the information relevant to the topic? Does it directly relate to the subject? Or does it veer off-track?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
/**/